Contact
Aurora and stars over a coastline at night

Coverage. Modelled, method published

Every engineer models this in an afternoon. Here are our numbers, with the method attached.

A pass figure that does not survive independent checking costs more than it earns. So we publish ours, we publish how we got them, and we publish where we lose.

Blönduós, contact time
102 min a day
Passes a day
11
Against a 40°N station
2.3×
Against Svalbard
~70%

Baseline case

Daily visibility for a 700km sun-synchronous satellite at 98.2° inclination, 5° elevation mask.

Svalbard
78.23°N, 141 min
Tromsø
69.66°N, 110 min
Esrange
67.88°N, 107 min
BlönduósPrimary site
65.65°N, 102 min
Reykjanes
63.97°N, 97 min
40°N reference
40.00°N, 45 min
Modelled contact minutes per day, 700 km SSO, 5° mask
Modelled, 700 km SSO, 98.2° inclination, 5° mask, 24h
StationLatitudePasses / dayContact min / dayvs 40°N
Svalbard78.23°N151413.2×
Tromsø69.66°N111102.5×
Esrange67.88°N111072.4×
Blönduós65.65°N111022.3×
Reykjanes63.97°N11972.2×
Mid-latitude reference40.00°N5451.0×
Polar elevation plot seen from Blönduós: an illustrative satellite pass from horizon to horizon above the 5 degree elevation mask NESW30°60° 5° MASK AOS LOS
Illustrative pass, sky view from 65.65°N — horizon at the rim, zenith at the centre. Modelled: 700 km SSO, ~11 passes and ~100 contact minutes a day.

Method. Numerical propagation of a circular sun-synchronous orbit in an Earth-fixed frame, with J2 nodal regression, 2s steps over 24 hours, counting contiguous intervals above the elevation mask. The same model reproduces the property KSAT publishes for Svalbard — that a station at that latitude sees essentially every revolution of a polar LEO above 500km. That agreement is the only reason we consider our own numbers worth publishing. The full method note and the sensitivity cases below are in the site data pack; we expect you to reproduce them rather than take them from us.

Sensitivity

Pass counts are altitude- and mask-dependent, and quoting a single number without the assumptions is how these figures get misused. Blönduós across the range:

Blönduós, 65.65°N — sensitivity across altitude and mask
CasePassesMin / day
500 km, 5° mask1071
700 km, 5° mask11102
700 km, 10° mask1069
Maximum GEO elevation angle — satellite on the same meridian
StationMax elevation
Reykjanes17.7°
Blönduós16.0°
Tromsø11.8°
Svalbard3.1°

Iceland is marginal but workable for geostationary and considerably better than the higher-latitude Nordic sites for mid-inclination orbits. It is the one place where the geometry genuinely favours us over Svalbard.

What a second site does not buy. Blönduós and Reykjanes are 217km apart, against a visibility radius of roughly 2,350km for a 700km orbit. Their pass sets are effectively identical. A second site buys weather, power and utility diversity — real value, and a different kind of value from additional contact time. It is not capacity, and it is not priced as capacity.

Next step

Take the model apart.

The method note, the sensitivity cases and the propagation assumptions go out on request. If your team reproduces it and gets a different answer, tell us — we would sooner correct a number than defend one.